People v. Brown

77 A.D.3d 446, 908 N.Y.S.2d 574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 A.D.3d 949

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered July 30, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth and seventh degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender whose prior felony conviction was a violent felony, to an aggregate term of 2V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

The People’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The remarks challenged by defendant generally constituted evidence-based arguments as to why the jury should credit the testimony of the prosecution witnesses and discredit that of defendant; these arguments were responsive to the defense summation and did not shift the burden of proof (see People v Dais, 47 AD3d 421, 422 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 809 [2008]; People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, 144 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 976 [1998]).

The People established a sufficient chain of custody for the drugs seized from defendant, providing reasonable assurances of their identity and substantially unchanged condition (see People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340 [1977]). Any deficiencies in the chain of custody went to the weight and not the admissibility of the evidence (see People v. White, 40 NY2d 797, 799-800 [1976]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 77 A.D.3d 446, 908 N.Y.S.2d 574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 446 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. White
358 N.E.2d 1031 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Dais
47 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Overlee
236 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)