People v. Boone

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Boone

25 Mich. App. 136

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7,150

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 Mich. App. 136 (People v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boone, 25 Mich. App. 136 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant appeals from a conviction of armed robbery, contending that he was not informed of the consequences of a guilty plea because he was not informed that such a plea waived prior procedural errors. Under GCR 1963, 785.3 such information need not be given. People v. Dunn (1968) , 380 Mich 693.

The appellant also contends that he was not fully informed about the nature of the charge against him. The record does not bear out this contention.

The appellant relies on Boykin v. Alabama (1969) , 395 US 238, (89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274). This Court is of the opinion that Boykin, supra, should be given prospective effect only. People v. Taylor (1970), 23 Mich App 595; People v. Butler (1970) , 23 Mich App 643. Therefore, it has no effect on this case. Furthermore, !the procedure followed below violates no rule laid down by Boykin, supra.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant appeals from a conviction of armed robbery, contending that he was not informed of the consequences of a guilty plea because he was not informed that such a plea waived prior procedural errors. Under GCR 1963, 785.3 such information need not be given. People v. Dunn (1968) , 380 Mich 693.

The appellant also contends that he was not fully informed about the nature of the charge against him. The record does not bear out this contention.

The appellant relies on Boykin v. Alabama (1969) , 395 US 238, (89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274). This Court is of the opinion that Boykin, supra, should be given prospective effect only. People v. Taylor (1970), 23 Mich App 595; People v. Butler (1970) , 23 Mich App 643. Therefore, it has no effect on this case. Furthermore, !the procedure followed below violates no rule laid down by Boykin, supra.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Mich. App. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boone-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack