People v. Bell

47 A.D.3d 441, 848 N.Y.S.2d 534
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.3d 1074

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 11, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of six years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The evidence at trial was sufficient to establish the “display” element of attempted robbery in the second degree (see Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]; People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214, 220-222 [1989]; People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 381 [1983]; People v Simmons, 186 AD2d 95, 97 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 976 [1993]), and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]).

We perceive no basis to reduce the sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bell, 47 A.D.3d 441, 848 N.Y.S.2d 534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

47 A.D.3d 441 (People v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baskerville
457 N.E.2d 752 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Lopez
535 N.E.2d 1328 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)