People v. Bell

33 A.D.3d 714, 821 N.Y.S.2d 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 A.D.3d 858

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), both rendered March 11, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree under indictment No. 04-00431 and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 04-00730, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

[715]*715Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

There is no basis in this record to vacate the defendant’s pleas of guilty, nor is there any evidence in the record that defense counsel provided ineffective representation. The defendant’s claims based upon matter dehors the record cannot be reviewed on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (see People v Spotards, 23 AD3d 586 [2005]). Any challenges'to the defendant’s resentencing pursuant to Penal Law § 60.09 under indictment No. 2004-00431 are cognizable upon a direct appeal from the resentence (see People v Van Aken, 83 AD2d 617 [1981]). Florio, J.E, Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bell, 33 A.D.3d 714, 821 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

33 A.D.3d 714 (People v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Spotards
23 A.D.3d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Van Aken
83 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)