People v. Bell

44 A.D.3d 1065, 844 N.Y.S.2d 407
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), rendered July 28, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the proof at trial, which included evidence that he shot the victim twice at close range, was legally insufficient to establish his intent to kill, is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Calabria, 3 NY3d 80, 81-82 [2004]; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bell, 44 A.D.3d 1065, 844 N.Y.S.2d 407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

44 A.D.3d 1065 (People v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubin v. Lamanna
E.D. New York, 2019
People v. Floyd
2019 NY Slip Op 2546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)