People v. Batista
114 A.D.3d 696, 979 N.Y.S.2d 819
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed February 15, 2011, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal is invalid (see People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803, 803 [2012]), and, thus, does not preclude his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, PJ., Balkin, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Batista, 114 A.D.3d 696, 979 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
114 A.D.3d 696 (People v. Batista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Vinson
2018 NY Slip Op 3712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)