People v. Batista
89 A.D.3d 1099, 933 N.Y.2d 585
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[1100]*1100Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not necessarily limited to, the validity of the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal and, if such waiver is found to be invalid, whether the sentence imposed was excessive. Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]). Rivera, J.P, Dickerson, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Batista, 89 A.D.3d 1099, 933 N.Y.2d 585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 1099 (People v. Batista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Martinez
126 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Barrett
98 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)