People v. Batista

60 A.D.3d 557, 874 N.Y.S.2d 808
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Batista. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 A.D.3d 793

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered May 25, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification. The victim had an ample opportunity to observe defendant during the robbery, and he gave a detective a detailed and accurate description.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Batista, 60 A.D.3d 557, 874 N.Y.S.2d 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

60 A.D.3d 557 (People v. Batista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)