People v. Batista
140 A.D.3d 522, 32 N.Y.S.3d 494
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Batista. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 696 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 2016·No. 4337/10 1475A 3635/13 488/15 1475·Published
Opinion
Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgments of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Judith Lieb, J.), rendered March 19, 2015, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed. Concur — Tom, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Batista, 140 A.D.3d 522, 32 N.Y.S.3d 494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).
140 A.D.3d 522 (People v. Batista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.