People v. Apted

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Apted

48 A.D.2d 859, 372 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10086

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 48 A.D.2d 859 (People v. Apted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Apted, 48 A.D.2d 859, 372 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 7, 1974, convicting him of attempted possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of intermittent imprisonment during a period of 60 days, to he followed by a period of probation of 4 years and 10 months. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1974, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The case is remitted to the Criminal Term for further proceedings on the motion to suppress consistent with the opinion in People v Lypka (36 NY2d 210) and the appeal will be held in abeyance in the interim. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur. [79 Misc 2d 777.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 7, 1974, convicting him of attempted possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of intermittent imprisonment during a period of 60 days, to he followed by a period of probation of 4 years and 10 months. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1974, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The case is remitted to the Criminal Term for further proceedings on the motion to suppress consistent with the opinion in People v Lypka (36 NY2d 210) and the appeal will be held in abeyance in the interim. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur. [79 Misc 2d 777.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 859, 372 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-apted-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack