People v. Apted

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Apted

51 A.D.2d 1024, 381 N.Y.S.2d 423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1024 (People v. Apted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Apted, 51 A.D.2d 1024, 381 N.Y.S.2d 423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 7, 1974, convicting him of attempted possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1974, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. By order dated June 9, 1975 this court remitted the case to the Criminal Term for further proceedings on the motion to suppress consistent with the opinion in People v Lypka (36 NY2d 210) and directed that the appeal be held in abeyance in the interim (People v Apted, 48 AD2d 859). The Criminal Term has now complied and rendered a decision in accordance therewith. Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur. ' [79 Misc 2d 777.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 7, 1974, convicting him of attempted possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1974, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. By order dated June 9, 1975 this court remitted the case to the Criminal Term for further proceedings on the motion to suppress consistent with the opinion in People v Lypka (36 NY2d 210) and directed that the appeal be held in abeyance in the interim (People v Apted, 48 AD2d 859). The Criminal Term has now complied and rendered a decision in accordance therewith. Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur. ' [79 Misc 2d 777.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1024, 381 N.Y.S.2d 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-apted-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack