People v. Ali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ali

207 A.D.2d 899, 616 N.Y.S.2d 996

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 899 (People v. Ali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ali, 207 A.D.2d 899, 616 N.Y.S.2d 996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered February 19, 1992, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of his right to a fair trial. Any claim of error with respect to the alleged instances of misconduct were either not preserved for appellate review or are without merit (see, People v Portalatin, 132 AD2d 581).

Further, we are satisfied that the defendant received meaningful representation at trial (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137) and was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered February 19, 1992, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that alleged instances of prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of his right to a fair trial. Any claim of error with respect to the alleged instances of misconduct were either not preserved for appellate review or are without merit (see, People v Portalatin, 132 AD2d 581).

Further, we are satisfied that the defendant received meaningful representation at trial (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137) and was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 899, 616 N.Y.S.2d 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ali-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack