People v. Ali
This text of 178 A.D.2d 418 (People v. Ali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), rendered December 6, 1988, convicting him of the crime of incest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
[419]*419Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that the sworn testimony of the victim establishing the required elements of incest applicable to this situation, i.e., the defendant’s (1) sexual intercourse (2) with a person related to him as a descendant (see, Penal Law § 255.25), was legally sufficient evidence of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D.2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ali-nyappdiv-1991.