People v. Ali

188 A.D.2d 476
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 476 (People v. Ali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ali, 188 A.D.2d 476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), imposed January 3, 1992, upon his convictions of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 8 to 24 years imprisonment upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, to run consecutively to an indeterminate term of 2 to 6 years imprisonment upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision that the terms of imprisonment shall run consecutively and substituting therefor a provision that the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently to each other; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

The transcript of the plea proceedings in this case demonstrates that the defendant’s convictions of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree were based on the same act, and there are no facts in the record which support the People’s speculation to the contrary. Accordingly, the imposition of consecutive terms was prohibited, and the sentence is modified to make the terms run concurrently (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; People v Durio, 175 AD2d 842; People v Ellis, 139 AD2d 662; People v Terry, 104 AD2d 572; cf., People v Brown, 80 NY2d 361).

The defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Eiber, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gaskin
220 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Banks
208 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Velez
206 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Sullivan
199 A.D.2d 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A.D.2d 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ali-nyappdiv-1992.