People v. Gaskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gaskin

220 A.D.2d 768, 633 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10504

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 A.D.2d 768 (People v. Gaskin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gaskin, 220 A.D.2d 768, 633 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant acknowledged in his plea allocution that he criminally possessed a handgun for approximately one week before he committed the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree. Accordingly, the same act did not provide the basis of his convictions of both crimes and the imposition of consecutive sentences was not prohibited (cf., People v Ali, 188 AD2d 476; People v Ellis, 139 AD2d 662). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant acknowledged in his plea allocution that he criminally possessed a handgun for approximately one week before he committed the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree. Accordingly, the same act did not provide the basis of his convictions of both crimes and the imposition of consecutive sentences was not prohibited (cf., People v Ali, 188 AD2d 476; People v Ellis, 139 AD2d 662). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 768, 633 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gaskin-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack