People ex rel. Rohr v. Owens

110 A.D. 30, 96 N.Y.S. 1054, 1905 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3858
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 110 A.D. 30 (People ex rel. Rohr v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Rohr v. Owens, 110 A.D. 30, 96 N.Y.S. 1054, 1905 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

Jenks, J.:

The relator holds a- draft, which reads:

[31]*31“ No. M. 998. Ossining, N. Y., Oet. 1, 1903.

“ TREASURER OF THE VILLAGE OF OSSINING,

Pay to the order of Andrew Rohr One Thousand Dollars, with legal interest on account of litigation.

“ $1,000.

“ J. M. Teewilliger, " ‘ ABRAM HYATT,

“ Cleric. President.”

After delivery of the draft the village of Ossining in its tax levy for the year 1903 included an amount necessary to pay it, and the money was raised and came into the hands of the then village treasurer, whose term expired in March, 1904. On October 7,1904, payment was demanded of his successor, who refused it, whereupon this proceeding was brought against him.

The learned counsel for the appellant states in his printed points: “ The money which was raised for the purpose of paying said draft was diverted from.its proper purpose to the payment of other drafts,” and no part of the money came into the official hands of the present treasurer. His contention is that under such circumstances this proceeding will not lie. As the money was raised and appropriated for a specific purpose, I think that the eye of the law still regards it as in the treasury and applicable to the discharge of the draft, and that this case must be decided upon the authority of People ex rel. Dannatt v. Comptroller (77 N. Y. 45). (See, too, People ex rel. Pennell v. Treanor, 15 App. Div. 508.) The final order is affirmed, with costs. Order to be settled before Jenks, J.

Hirschberg, P. J., Bartlett, Woodward and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Final order affirmed, with costs. Settle order before Jenks, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Osborn v. Board of Trustees
119 Misc. 357 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)
State ex rel. City of Cut Bank v. McNamer
205 P. 951 (Montana Supreme Court, 1922)
American Metal Ceiling Co. v. New Hyde Park Fire District
172 A.D. 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
People ex rel. City of Tonawanda v. Fitzhenry
170 A.D. 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
American Metal Ceiling Co. v. New Hyde Park Fire District
91 Misc. 236 (New York County Courts, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D. 30, 96 N.Y.S. 1054, 1905 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-rohr-v-owens-nyappdiv-1905.