People ex rel. Hendy v. Leonardo
This text of 173 A.D.2d 992 (People ex rel. Hendy v. Leonardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Berke, J.), entered August 23, 1990 in Washington County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Supreme Court properly denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus insofar as his allegations concerning his indictment and conviction were or could have been raised on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion (see, People ex rel. Rosado v Miles, 138 AD2d 808). In addition, the allegations in his petition do not warrant a departure from traditional orderly procedure (see, People ex rel. Grady v LeFevre, 152 AD2d 850, lv denied 75 NY2d 702). Finally, it is well settled that a writ of habeas corpus is an improper vehicle for testing a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel (see, People ex rel. Grant v Scully, 133 AD2d 359).
Judgment affirmed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D.2d 992, 569 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hendy-v-leonardo-nyappdiv-1991.