Reynoso v. LeFevre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reynoso v. LeFevre

199 A.D.2d 886, 608 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12480

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 886 (Reynoso v. LeFevre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reynoso v. LeFevre, 199 A.D.2d 886, 608 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

White, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered February 19, 1993 in Clinton County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

We affirm. Petitioner’s application is legally insufficient as it is devoid of any factual support for his allegation that the disciplinary determination rendered against him on March 23, 1992 is affected by procedural errors, due process violations or violations of the Correction Law (see, People ex rel. Hendy v Leonardo, 173 AD2d 992, lv denied 78 NY2d 857; Matter of Malik v Berlinland, 158 AD2d 836, lv denied 76 NY2d 704).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered February 19, 1993 in Clinton County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

We affirm. Petitioner’s application is legally insufficient as it is devoid of any factual support for his allegation that the disciplinary determination rendered against him on March 23, 1992 is affected by procedural errors, due process violations or violations of the Correction Law (see, People ex rel. Hendy v Leonardo, 173 AD2d 992, lv denied 78 NY2d 857; Matter of Malik v Berlinland, 158 AD2d 836, lv denied 76 NY2d 704).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 886, 608 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynoso-v-lefevre-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack