People ex rel. Baron v. New York State Department of Corrections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Baron v. New York State Department of Corrections

94 A.D.3d 1410, 942 N.Y.S.2d 392

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 2012·Published·Cited by 42 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered October 19, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Inasmuch as he has been released to parole supervision, this appeal by petitioner from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been rendered moot (see People ex rel. Graham v Fischer, 70 AD3d 1381, 1381-1382 [2010]; People ex rel. Mitchell v Unger, 63 AD3d 1591 [2009]; People ex rel. Hampton v Dennison, 59 AD3d 951 [2009] , lv denied 12 NY3d 711 [2009]), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply herein (see Graham, 70 AD3d at 1381-1382; Hampton, 59 AD3d at 951; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Present— Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered October 19, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Inasmuch as he has been released to parole supervision, this appeal by petitioner from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been rendered moot (see People ex rel. Graham v Fischer, 70 AD3d 1381, 1381-1382 [2010]; People ex rel. Mitchell v Unger, 63 AD3d 1591 [2009]; People ex rel. Hampton v Dennison, 59 AD3d 951 [2009] , lv denied 12 NY3d 711 [2009]), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply herein (see Graham, 70 AD3d at 1381-1382; Hampton, 59 AD3d at 951; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Present— Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

People ex rel. Baron v. New York State Department of Corrections, 94 A.D.3d 1410, 942 N.Y.S.2d 392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

94 A.D.3d 1410 (People ex rel. Baron v. New York State Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related