ANDERSON, WILLIAM v. JAMES, RANDY
This text of ANDERSON, WILLIAM v. JAMES, RANDY (ANDERSON, WILLIAM v. JAMES, RANDY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
119 KAH 13-00495 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. WILLIAM ANDERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RANDY JAMES, SUPERINTENDENT, LIVINGSTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
GENESEE VALLEY LEGAL AID, INC., GENESEO (JEANNIE D. MICHALSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARTIN A. HOTVET OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Robert B. Wiggins, A.J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, petitioner contends that his right to due process was violated. While this appeal was pending, however, petitioner was released to parole supervision, and thus this appeal has been rendered moot (see People ex rel. Moore v Lempke, 101 AD3d 1665, 1665-1666, lv denied 20 NY3d 863). The exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see People ex rel. Baron v New York State Dept. of Corr., 94 AD3d 1410, 1410, lv denied 19 NY3d 807; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715).
Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANDERSON, WILLIAM v. JAMES, RANDY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-william-v-james-randy-nyappdiv-2015.