People ex rel. Smith v. Cully

112 A.D.3d 1316, 976 N.Y.S.2d 906

This text of 112 A.D.3d 1316 (People ex rel. Smith v. Cully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Smith v. Cully, 112 A.D.3d 1316, 976 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), dated August 6, 2012 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition.

[1317]*1317It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner’s appeal from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been rendered moot by his release from custody upon reaching his maximum expiration date (see People ex rel. Baron v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 94 AD3d 1410, 1410 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 807 [2012]; People ex rel. Kendricks v Smith, 52 AD2d 1090, 1090 [1976]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply, inasmuch as the alleged error he identifies on appeal is not likely to recur, the alleged error is not one typically evading review, and the appeal does not involve any substantial or novel issues (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People ex rel. Kendricks v. Smith
52 A.D.2d 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People ex rel. Baron v. New York State Department of Corrections
94 A.D.3d 1410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.3d 1316, 976 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-cully-nyappdiv-2013.