People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley

Illinois Supreme Court

People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley

48 N.E. 688, 167 Ill. 638

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 12, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 48 N.E. 688 (People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley, 48 N.E. 688, 167 Ill. 638 (Ill. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Carter

announced the opinion of the court:

By this motion respondent Joseph Kipley asks, first, for leave to withdraw his plea; second, to file an amended answer; and third, to file a supplemental answer. Nothing more is before us than the bare motion. No showing has been made nor reasons filed in support of the motion, and we are unable to say whether the motion should be allowed or not, and it must therefore be overruled.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Carter

announced the opinion of the court:

By this motion respondent Joseph Kipley asks, first, for leave to withdraw his plea; second, to file an amended answer; and third, to file a supplemental answer. Nothing more is before us than the bare motion. No showing has been made nor reasons filed in support of the motion, and we are unable to say whether the motion should be allowed or not, and it must therefore be overruled.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 N.E. 688, 167 Ill. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-akin-v-kipley-ill-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack