Home/Supreme Court/Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Yahn & McDonnell, Inc.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Yahn & McDonnell, Inc.

481 U.S. 735, 107 S. Ct. 2171, 95 L. Ed. 2d 692, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2051
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 18, 1987
Docket86-231
StatusPublished
Cited by69 cases

This text of 481 U.S. 735 (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Yahn & McDonnell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Yahn & McDonnell, Inc., 481 U.S. 735, 107 S. Ct. 2171, 95 L. Ed. 2d 692, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2051 (1987).

Opinion

481 U.S. 735 (1987)

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
v.
YAHN & McDONNELL, INC., ET AL.

No. 86-231.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 27, 1987
Decided May 18, 1987[*]
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Gary M. Ford argued the cause for appellants in both cases. With him on the briefs for appellant in No. 86-231 were Peter H. Gould, David F. Power, Kenneth S. Geller, Kathryn A. Oberly, and Mitchell L. Strickler. Richard H. Markowitz and Paula R. Markowitz filed briefs for appellants in No. 86-253.

Carl L. Taylor argued the cause for appellees in both cases. With him on the brief were Glenn Summers and William H. Ewing.[†]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 86-253, United Retail & Wholesale Employees Teamsters Union Local No. 115 Pension Plan et al. v. Yahn & McDonnell, Inc., et al., also on appeal from the same court.

[†] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal in No. 86-231 were filed for the National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans by Gerald M. Feder, David R. Levin, and Nik B. Edes; and for the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1950 and 1974 Pension Plans by Israel Goldowitz.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance in both cases were filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States by Stephen A. Bokat and Robin S. Conrad; and for Flying Tiger Line Inc., et al. by Douglas D. Broadwater, R. Franklin Balotti, Jesse A. Finkelstein, William W. Bowser, and Lawrence M. Nagin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Pension Fund v. D.A. Nolt, Inc.
719 F. Supp. 2d 530 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2010)
BA Properties Inc. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands
299 F.3d 207 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Crown Clothing, Inc.
27 F. Supp. 2d 507 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Galgay v. Beaverbrook Coal Company
105 F.3d 137 (Third Circuit, 1997)
Board of Trustees of the District No. 15 MacHinists Pension Fund v. Kahle Engineering Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation
43 F.3d 852 (Third Circuit, 1994)
In The Matter Of Lawrence B. Seidman
37 F.3d 911 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. MAR-LEN, Inc.
30 F.3d 621 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.
508 U.S. 602 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.—Pension Fund v. Able Truck Rental Corp.
822 F. Supp. 1096 (D. New Jersey, 1993)
Central States v. Bell Transit Co.
821 F. Supp. 1266 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)
Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Gotham Fuel Corp.
860 F. Supp. 1044 (D. New Jersey, 1993)
Board Of Trustees Of Trucking Employees Of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc.--Pension Fund v. Centra
983 F.2d 495 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Centra
983 F.2d 495 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Independence Public Media of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network Commission
808 F. Supp. 416 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Cross-Appellees v. Lady Baltimore Foods, Inc., Cross-Appellant
960 F.2d 1339 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Hayes
789 F. Supp. 1430 (N.D. Illinois, 1992)
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
787 F. Supp. 136 (N.D. Illinois, 1992)
Connors v. Incoal Inc.
781 F. Supp. 50 (District of Columbia, 1992)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Carman
781 F. Supp. 1086 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
Local 478 Trucking & Allied Industries Pension Fund v. Jayne
778 F. Supp. 1289 (D. New Jersey, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 U.S. 735, 107 S. Ct. 2171, 95 L. Ed. 2d 692, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pension-benefit-guaranty-corporation-v-yahn-mcdonnell-inc-scotus-1987.