Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.
241 A.D. 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D. 790 →
Opinion
In view of the decision in Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co. (post, p. 833), decided herewith, it now appears on the reargument that the appellants Greater New York Export House, Inc., and McKiniry, receiver, were without standing in the action; therefore, the order dated August 28, 1933, on reargument, is unanimously affirmed, with costs. The appeal from the order dated August 14, 1933, is dismissed. No opinion.. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co., 241 A.D. 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 832 (Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.