Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.

235 A.D. 822

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D. 790 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1932·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The plaintiffs did not establish either complete or substantial compliance with paragraph first of Exhibit A, the doing of which was a condition precedent to a recovery by the plaintiffs. Accordingly, there was no basis for a direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs under the stipulation of the parties with respect to practice herein. Appeal from order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The plaintiffs did not establish either complete or substantial compliance with paragraph first of Exhibit A, the doing of which was a condition precedent to a recovery by the plaintiffs. Accordingly, there was no basis for a direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs under the stipulation of the parties with respect to practice herein. Appeal from order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co., 235 A.D. 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

235 A.D. 822 (Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.