Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.

235 A.D. 822

This text of 235 A.D. 822 (Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co., 235 A.D. 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The plaintiffs did not establish either complete or substantial compliance with paragraph first of Exhibit A, the doing of which was a condition precedent to a recovery by the plaintiffs. Accordingly, there was no basis for a direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs under the stipulation of the parties with respect to practice herein. Appeal from order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peirson-v-lloyds-first-mortgage-co-nyappdiv-1932.