Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.

234 A.D. 627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D. 790

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. TMs is an action upon the theory of money had and received. Notwithstanding the foreclosure action by the defendant, the plaintiff in that action, there remained for disposition in tMs action the conditions specified in paragraphs 1 and 2 of plaintiffs’ Exhibit A, annexed to the complaint. There is no evidence in the record of compliance with these conditions. The foreclosure action eliminated all other questions and conditions subject to wMch the money is claimed to have been deposited with the defendant by the plaintiffs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co., 234 A.D. 627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

234 A.D. 627 (Peirson v. Lloyds First Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.