Pedlecador Clemente Caparrosa C. (Cargill) v. The Government of the Canal Zone
411 F.2d 956, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12547
Opinions
On the Government’s motion to reverse and remand acknowledging error in the receipt of statements in violation of Miranda requirements (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694), which our independent examination bears out, the judgment of the District Court is reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The mandate shall issue immediately, FRAP 41(a).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pedlecador Clemente Caparrosa C. (Cargill) v. The Government of the Canal Zone, 411 F.2d 956, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12547 (5th Cir. 1969).
411 F.2d 956 (Pedlecador Clemente Caparrosa C. (Cargill) v. The Government of the Canal Zone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Crosby
249 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (S.D. Florida, 2003)
United States v. Anthony Caldwell
954 F.2d 496 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Bernard Stewart
576 F.2d 50 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Pedlecador Clemente Caparrosa C. (Cargill) v. The Government of the Canal Zone
411 F.2d 956 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)