(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 16, 2020·No. 2:90-cv-00520·Unknown

Opinion

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff-Intervenor Christopher Lipsey moves to file a previously-submitted exhibit under seal. Because the exhibit contains information identifying class members and is covered by a protective order previously issued in this action (ECF No. 2109), this court finds good cause to grant Lipsey’s motion. See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (showing of good cause required to seal exhibits to non-dispositive motion). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Lipsey’s July 9, 2020 motion to seal (ECF No. 6754) is granted. 2. Exhibit L to the declaration of Kate Falkenstien attached to the parties’ Joint Discovery Dispute Statement (ECF No. 6746-13) shall be stricken from the public record. //// //// //// MASE 2 GU UVM OUTING NI VO PO ee OY ove

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal: (a) Lipsey’s July 9, 2020 motion to seal, and (b) Exhibit L to the declaration of Kate Falkenstien attached to the parties’ Joint Discovery Dispute Statement (ECF No. 6746-13). Dated: July 16, 2020

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Di/prisones-civil rights/cole0520.lipsey ex seal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom ((PC) Coleman v. Newsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.