(PC) Brummett v. Martinez

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 26, 2024
Docket1:21-cv-00086
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Brummett v. Martinez ((PC) Brummett v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Brummett v. Martinez, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-00086-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SECOND SCHEDULING ORDER 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO SEND LOCAL RULE 281 TO 14 MARTINEZ, PLAINTIFF 15 Defendant. Pretrial Conference: August 13, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 16 (BAM)

17 Motions in Limine Hearing: September 30, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) 18 Jury Trial: 19 October 16, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM)1 20 21 Plaintiff Melvin Ray Brummett, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 22 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties have consented to 23 the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 105.) This case is now ready to 24 be set for jury trial on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Martinez (“Defendant”) for retaliation 25 in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference to risk of harm in violation of the 26

27 1 At the March 26, 2024 trial scheduling conference, the parties were informed that jury trial would begin on Tuesday, October 15, 2024. However, in light of the Monday holiday closure, 28 the Court finds it appropriate to set the first day of trial on Wednesday, October 16, 2024. 1 Eighth Amendment. 2 I. Pretrial Statements 3 The parties are required to file pretrial statements in accordance with the schedule set 4 forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial statement 5 under Local Rule 281, the parties will be required to submit requests to obtain the attendance of 6 incarcerated witnesses. The procedures, requirements and deadlines for such a request are 7 outlined in detail below. 8 At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of 9 the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of 10 trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. Plaintiff is responsible for 11 producing all of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or 12 witness testimony. If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain 13 procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify. 14 II. Witnesses 15 A. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Testify 16 Voluntarily 17 An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot 18 come to court unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be 19 transported to court. The Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that the 20 prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. 21 A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed 22 voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file concurrent with the pretrial statement a written 23 motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The 24 motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such witness; 25 and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that 26 each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for 27 Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.” 28 /// 1 The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party 2 himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has 3 informed the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in 4 which declaration the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party 5 of this willingness; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of 6 perjury by the prospective witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify 7 without being subpoenaed. 8 The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two 9 ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an 10 eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell 11 and, at the time, Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may 12 swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty 13 of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a 14 declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness 15 describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether 16 the declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the 17 incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness 18 happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred. 19 The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 20 specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will 21 issue the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court. 22 Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial, if any, must be filed on or 23 before June 18, 2024. Objections, if any, must be filed on or before July 19, 2024. 24 B. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 25 Testify Voluntarily 26 If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify 27 voluntarily, the party should submit with the pretrial statement a motion for the attendance of 28 such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, the party must 1 indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily. 2 C. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 3 Testify Voluntarily 4 It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness’s voluntary 5 attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought or 6 obtained from the Court. 7 D. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 8 Testify Voluntarily 9 If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify voluntarily, the 10 witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the party seeking the 11 witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the case of 12 an unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus 13 the witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821. 14 If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who 15 refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and 16 location of each unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each 17 unincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness, 18 submit a money order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel 19 expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the 20 unincarcerated witness by the United States Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the 21 Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Heller
551 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Brummett v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-brummett-v-martinez-caed-2024.