Payne v. State

594 So. 2d 870, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2485, 1992 WL 48382
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1503
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 870 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. State, 594 So. 2d 870, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2485, 1992 WL 48382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

In this appeal of a sentence brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellate counsel points out two procedural errors regarding a discrepancy between the oral and written sentences. We agree that remand to the trial court is necessary to correct the written sentence to conform to the oral pronouncement by striking the 15-year probationary term imposed under Count I and transferring that probationary term to Count II, as well as to correct the heading on that latter sentencing form to indicate Count II. Appellant’s sentence is otherwise affirmed.

SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barger v. State
688 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Williams v. State
604 So. 2d 8 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 870, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2485, 1992 WL 48382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.