Payne v. State
630 So. 2d 235, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 434, 1994 WL 26998
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Payne v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 So. 2d 111 →
Opinion
Affirmed. We conclude that the self-incriminating statements which defendant made freely and voluntarily after being given his Miranda rights were properly admitted in evidence. Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564, 107 S.Ct. 851, 93 L.Ed.2d 954 (1987). We also conclude that the prosecutor’s comment was not an impermissible comment on defendant’s right to remain silent, but was rather a proper comment on the above-mentioned pretrial statements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Payne v. State, 630 So. 2d 235, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 434, 1994 WL 26998 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
630 So. 2d 235 (Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colorado v. Spring
479 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1987)