Paulo v. Williams
This text of Paulo v. Williams (Paulo v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4|| Justin Paulo, Case No. 2:19-cv-00474-CDS-NJK 5 Plaintiff Order Closing Case v. 7|| Brian Williams, et al., 8 Defendants 9 10 This matter is currently on appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. ECF Nos. 143, 163. Because these appeals divest the district court of jurisdiction, the 12|| Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to administratively close this case.! B Dated: February 19, 2025 J, / shies _— 15 Cristir Silva U fee States District Judge 16 lV 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 An order administratively closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect. Dees v. Billy, 394 F.3d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 2005); See also Penn West Assocs., Inc. v. Cohen, 371 F.3d 118, 128 Gd 26]| Cir. 2004) (“an order merely directing that a case be marked closed constitutes an administrative closing that has no legal consequence other than to remove that case from the district court’s active docket”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paulo v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulo-v-williams-nvd-2025.