Paulo v. Williams
Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 JUSTIN PAULO, Case No. 2:19-cv-00474-CDS-NJK 6 Plaintiff, ORDER Y- [Docket No. 146] BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to file joint pretrial order. 11|| Docket No. 146.1 Defendants failed to respond. See Docket. Therefore, the motion is properly 12 GRANTED as unopposed. Local Rule 7-2(d). For good cause shown, the Court EXTENDS the 13|| deadline to file a joint pretrial order to February 16, 2024. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: January 19, 2024 Nancy J. Koppe — 17 United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27), ——__________ ' The Court construes pro se filings liberally. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 28] (9th Cir. 2013).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paulo v. Williams (Paulo v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.