Paulo v. Williams
This text of Paulo v. Williams (Paulo v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 JUSTIN PAULO, Case No. 2:19-cv-00474-CDS-NJK 6 Plaintiff, ORDER Y- [Docket No. 146] BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to file joint pretrial order. 11|| Docket No. 146.1 Defendants failed to respond. See Docket. Therefore, the motion is properly 12 GRANTED as unopposed. Local Rule 7-2(d). For good cause shown, the Court EXTENDS the 13|| deadline to file a joint pretrial order to February 16, 2024. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: January 19, 2024 Nancy J. Koppe — 17 United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27), ——__________ ' The Court construes pro se filings liberally. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 28] (9th Cir. 2013).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paulo v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulo-v-williams-nvd-2024.