Paulo v. Williams

Opinion

1 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

JUSTIN PAULO, Case No. 2:19-cv-00474-CDS-NJK 5 Plaintiff, él y. Order [Docket No. 165] 7) BRIAN WILLIAMS, et ai., 8 Defendant. 9 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a copy of his response to Defendants’ 10] motion for summary judgment at Docket No. 101. Docket No. 165.! It is a litigant’s responsibility 11} to maintain copies of his filings. Given Plaintiff's pro se status and as a one-time courtesy, 12 however, the Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk’s Office to mail Plaintiff a copy of his response to 13] Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 101). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for 14] copies is GRANTED. Docket No. 165. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: February 29, 2024 ee.

18 Nancy Keppe _ United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27), ————_____ ' The Court construes pro se filings liberally. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 28] (9th Cir. 2013).