Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 509
United States Customs Court·Decided May 15, 1957·No. No. 60755; protests 287763-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[502]*502Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 501 (cusc 1957).

38 Cust. Ct. 501 (Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.