Paul a. Straub & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Paul a. Straub & Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 437, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1932

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul a. Straub & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Cust. Ct. 442 →

United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1954·No. No. 57952; protests 190845-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Paul a. Straub & Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 437, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1932 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 437 (Paul a. Straub & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.