Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 393
United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1956·No. No. 59819; protests 198828-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a), and the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 393 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 393 (Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.