Patterson v. Angelone

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 195
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2000·No. 00-6694·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6694

WALTER E. PATTERSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-696-3)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter E. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Walter E. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we deny Patterson’s motion for a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Patterson v. Angelone, No. CA-99-696-3 (E.D. Va. Apr.

17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2000).

Patterson v. Angelone (Patterson v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related