Patterson v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Patterson v. Angelone

33 F. App'x 111

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 195 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2002·No. 02-6054·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Edward Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Patterson v. Angelone, No. CA-00-595-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Edward Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Patterson v. Angelone, No. CA-00-595-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Patterson v. Angelone, 33 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 111 (Patterson v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related