Patterson v. Angelone

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 1999·No. 99-6945·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6945

LARRY E. PATTERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-99-430)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry E. Patterson appeals the district courts order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Patter-

son’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny in forma

pauperis status, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Patterson v. Angelone, No. CA-99-430 (E.D. Va.

June 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 1999).

Patterson v. Angelone (Patterson v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related