Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Parker v. State

Parker v. State

574 So. 2d 1203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 1991 WL 20423
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1991
DocketNo. 89-03401
StatusPublished

This text of 574 So. 2d 1203 (Parker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. State, 574 So. 2d 1203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 1991 WL 20423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Except for a scrivener’s error, appellant has failed to show error has occurred regarding his sentence. See Washington v. State, 564 So.2d 168 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed but for the scrivener’s error, for which we remand. Upon remand, the trial court shall correct Parker’s sentence on the violation of probation charge to show that the sentence for the two lewd and lascivious counts should run concurrent with each other and consecutive to the sentence for the witness tampering charge.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction pursuant to this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. State
564 So. 2d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 So. 2d 1203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1427, 1991 WL 20423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.