Parker v. State

538 So. 2d 978, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 956, 1989 WL 15934
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1989
DocketNo. 88-651
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 So. 2d 978 (Parker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. State, 538 So. 2d 978, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 956, 1989 WL 15934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

ZEHMER, Judge.

We affirm the legality of the sentence and the trial court’s determination to sentence defendant, Timmie L. Parker, as an habitual offender. The sentencing court’s findings of fact in support of that determination need not be stated in writing so long as such findings are stated at a reported hearing. Adams v. State, 376 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). We decline to follow the second district’s decision requiring such findings to be in writing, Hoefert v. State, 509 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), and certify direct conflict to the supreme court.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. State
546 So. 2d 727 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 So. 2d 978, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 956, 1989 WL 15934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.