Parker v. State

500 So. 2d 721, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 218
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 1987
Docket85-2463, 85-2464
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 500 So. 2d 721 (Parker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. State, 500 So. 2d 721, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

500 So.2d 721 (1987)

Eric C. PARKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 85-2463, 85-2464.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 7, 1987.

*722 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Theda R. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals from his sentence and assessment of costs against him resulting from his plea of nolo contendere and adjudication of guilt for murder in the first degree, robbery with a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit murder in the first degree, and conspiracy to commit robbery with a deadly weapon.

Appellant raises a number of challenges to the imposition of costs. He first argues that the trial court erred in imposing costs pursuant to sections 943.25(4), 943.25(8) and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985), without prior notice and opportunity to be heard. We agree and reverse. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Adams v. State, 497 So.2d 1309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Appellant also attacks the imposition of costs under section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), on the theory that the statute violates ex post facto restrictions of the United States and Florida Constitutions as applied to him because the crimes to which he pled no contest occurred prior to the effective date of the statute. See Bowman v. State, 495 So.2d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Yost v. State, 489 So.2d 131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). However, appellant did not raise this challenge at trial, and we decline to rule on the issue at this time. Johnson v. State, 495 So.2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Nevertheless, our holding is without prejudice to appellant to seek relief in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

We need not discuss appellant's final points.

We affirm appellant's conviction and the sentences imposed. We vacate the costs imposed pursuant to sections 943.25(4), 943.25(8) and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985).

CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael J. Drayton
113 F.3d 1191 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Williams v. State
507 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Bostic v. State
504 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Arnold v. State
505 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Amison v. State
504 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
500 So. 2d 721, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.