Parker v. Owen

189 P.2d 81, 83 Cal. App. 2d 474, 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 5, 1948
DocketCiv. No. 16191
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 189 P.2d 81 (Parker v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Owen, 189 P.2d 81, 83 Cal. App. 2d 474, 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinions

McCOMB, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the trial court denying plaintiff's motion to dismiss the action before any evidence was offered.

This is the single question presented for determination :

Is an order denying a motion to dismiss an action before any evidence is offered an appealable order?

This question must be answered in the negative for the reason that an order denying a motion to dismiss an action before any evidence is received is not an appealable order. (Perry v. Magneson, 207 Cal. 617, 620 [279 P. 650] ; Andersen v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 95, 97. [200 P. 963]; Garthwaite v. Bank of Tulare, 134 Cal. 237, 243 [66 P. 326] ; Halsey v. Sears, 90 Cal.App. 306 et seq. [265 P. 858]; Forrester v. Lawler, 14 Cal.App. 170, 171 [111 P. 284].)

In view of the foregoing rule the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Moore, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel v. Stevedoring Services of America
24 Cal. App. 4th 414 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
Obergfell v. Obergfell
286 P.2d 462 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Eistrat v. Humiston
277 P.2d 463 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 P.2d 81, 83 Cal. App. 2d 474, 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-owen-calctapp-1948.