Paramore v. State
70 So. 3d 615, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6329, 2011 WL 1682210
Opinion
We are satisfied in light of the recent order directing the state to respond to the petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief that the circuit court is taking appropriate measures to dispose of that motion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commn., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Nonetheless, as we did in Munn, we encourage the circuit court to expeditiously rule on the motion pending before it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paramore v. State, 70 So. 3d 615, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6329, 2011 WL 1682210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
70 So. 3d 615 (Paramore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)