Paramore v. State

41 So. 3d 1114, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12194, 2010 WL 3239184
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 18, 2010
Docket3D09-2619
StatusPublished

This text of 41 So. 3d 1114 (Paramore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paramore v. State, 41 So. 3d 1114, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12194, 2010 WL 3239184 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion for DNA testing under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. The trial court denied this motion as being successive. We have taken judicial notice of this court’s file in Paramore v. McDonough, 935 So.2d 2 (Fla.2006). In 2004, in response to an earlier postconviction motion by defendant-appellant Paramore, the trial court denied a request for DNA testing upon a finding that physical evidence that may contain DNA does not exist. This point was also made by the defendant’s public defender, in correspondence contained in the file. We therefore affirm the order now before us.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 1114, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12194, 2010 WL 3239184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paramore-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.