Panther Oil & Grease Manufacturing Co. v. Clippinger

17 A.D.2d 756, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8275

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The defendant has failed to show that his default was the result of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (Kurtz v. Wilder, 284 App. Div. 1051; General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Rembrandt Graphic Arts Co., 281 App. Div. 1028.) Further, the motion was not timely. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 108.) (Appeal by plaintiff from order of Oneida County Court, resetting the order of said court which confirmed the court’s prior order opening the default judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panther Oil & Grease Manufacturing Co. v. Clippinger, 17 A.D.2d 756, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

17 A.D.2d 756 (Panther Oil & Grease Manufacturing Co. v. Clippinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Rembrandt Graphic Arts Co.
281 A.D. 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Kurtz v. Wilder
284 A.D. 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)