Kurtz v. Wilder
This text of 284 A.D. 1051 (Kurtz v. Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a motion to vacate a default suffered when her case was called for trial, and from so much of an order made on reargument as adheres to the original decision. Order on reargument, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff failed to show that the default was not deliberate. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 1051, 135 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurtz-v-wilder-nyappdiv-1954.