General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Rembrandt Graphic Arts Co.

281 A.D. 1028, 121 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 1028 (General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Rembrandt Graphic Arts Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Rembrandt Graphic Arts Co., 281 A.D. 1028, 121 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. The defendant failed to show that the judgment against it was the result of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect as provided for in section 108 of the Civil Practice Act. On the contrary the default here appears to have been intentional. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Panther Oil & Grease Manufacturing Co. v. Clippinger
17 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
City Factors Corp. v. Heron
33 Misc. 2d 105 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Domine v. State
1 Misc. 2d 846 (New York State Court of Claims, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 1028, 121 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-aniline-film-corp-v-rembrandt-graphic-arts-co-nyappdiv-1953.