Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. Knox

277 U.S. 218, 48 S. Ct. 451, 72 L. Ed. 857, 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,297, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 684, 56 A.L.R. 583
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 14, 1928
Docket288
StatusPublished
Cited by287 cases

This text of 277 U.S. 218 (Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. Knox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. Knox, 277 U.S. 218, 48 S. Ct. 451, 72 L. Ed. 857, 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,297, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 684, 56 A.L.R. 583 (1928).

Opinions

Me. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Chapter 116 of the Laws of Mississippi of 1922 provided that “ any person engaged in the business of distributing gasoline, or retail dealer in gasoline, shall pay for the privilege of engaging in such business, an excise tax of 14 [one cent] per gallon upon the sale of gasoline . . . ,” except that sold in interstate commerce or purchased outside the State and brought in by the consumer for his own use. Chapter 115, Laws of 1924, increased the tax to three cents and c. 119, Laws of 1926, made it four, cents per gallon. Since some time in 1925 petitioner has been engaged in that business. The State sued to recover taxes claimed on account of sales made by petitioner to •the United States for the use of its Coast Guard Fleet in service in the Gulf of Mexico and its Veterans’ Hospital at Gulfport. Some of the sales were made while the Act of 1924 was in force and some after the rate had been increased by the Act of 1926. Accordingly the demand was for three cents a gallon on some and four cents on the rest. Petitioner defended on the ground that these sthtutes, if construed to impose taxes on such sales, are [221]*221repugnant to the federal Constitution. The court of first instance sustained that contention and the State appealed. The Supreme Court held the exaction a valid privilege tax measured by the number of gallons sold; that it was not a tax upon instrumentalities of the federal government and that the United States was not entitled to buy such gasoline without payment of the taxes charged dealers. 147 Miss. 663.

The United States is empowered by the Constitution to maintain, and operate the fleet and hospital. Art. I, § 8. That authorization and laws enacted pursuant thereto are supreme (Art. VI); and, in case of conflict, they control state enactments. The Státes may not burden or interfere with the exertion of national power or make it a source of revenue or take the funds raised or tax the means used for the performance of federal functions. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 425, et seq. Dobbins v. The Commissioners of Erie County, 16 Pet. 435, 448. Ohio v. Thomas, 173 U. S. 276. Choctaw & Gulf R. R. v. Harrison, 235 U. S. 292. Indian Oil Co. v. Oklahoma, 240 U. S. 522. Johnson v. Maryland, 254 U. S. 51. Clallam County v. United States, 263 U. S. 341, 344. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 275 U. S. 136. New Brunswick v. United States, 276 U. S. 547. The strictness of that rule was emphasized in Gillespie v. Oklahoma, 257 U. S. 501, 505. The right of the United States to make such purchases is derived from the Constitution. The petitioner’s right to make sales to the United States was not given by the State and does not depend on state laws; it results from the authority of the national government under the Constitution to choose its own means and sources of supply. While Mississippi may-impose charges upon petitioner for the privilege of carrying on trade that is subject to the power of the State, it may not lay any tax upon transactions by which the United States secures the things desired for its governmental purposes,

[222]*222- The validity of the taxes claimed is to be determined by the practical effect of enforcement in respect of sales to the government. Wagner v. City of Covington, 251 U. S. 95, 102. A charge at the prescribed rate is made on account of every gallon acquired by the United States. It is immaterial that the seller and not the purchaser is required to report and make payment to the State. Sale and purchase constitute a transaction by which the tax is measured and on which the burden rests. The amount of money claimed by the State rises and, falls precisely as does the quantity of gasoline so secured by the Government. ' It depends immediately upon the number of gallons. The necessary operation of these enactments when so construed is directly to retard, impede and burden the exertion by the United States of its constitutional powers to operate the fleet and hospital. McCulloch v. Maryland, supra, 436. Gillespie v. Oklahoma, supra, 505. Jaybird Mining Co. v. Weir, 271 U. S. 609, 613. To use the number of gallons sold the United States as a measure of the privilege tax is in substance and legal effect to tax the sale. Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460. Frick v. Pennsylvania, 268 U. S. 473, 494. And that is to tax the United States — to exact tribute on its transactions and apply thé same to the support of the State.

The exactions demanded from petitioner infringe its right to have the constitutional independence of the United States in respept of such purchases remain untrammeled. Osborn v. United States Bank, 9 Wheat. 738, 867. Telegraph Co. v. Texas, supra. Cf. Terrace v. Thompson, 263 U. S. 197, 216. Petitioner is not liable for the taxes claimed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School District
597 F.3d 1007 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Rowley v. State
939 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Dalack v. VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA, FLORIDA
434 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (S.D. Florida, 2006)
Freethought Society v. Chester County
334 F.3d 247 (Third Circuit, 2003)
Grip Development, Inc. v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate, Inc.
788 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cook Oil Co., Inc. v. United States
919 F. Supp. 1556 (M.D. Alabama, 1996)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1993
Rainbow Navigation, Inc. v. Department of the Navy
699 F. Supp. 339 (District of Columbia, 1988)
South Carolina v. Baker
485 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1988)
COMPTROLLER OF TREASURY, IT DIV. v. Armco, Inc.
521 A.2d 785 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
V-1 Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
559 P.2d 756 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Diamond National Corp. v. State Board of Equalization
49 Cal. App. 3d 778 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
20 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,957 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
Tonasket v. State
488 P.2d 281 (Washington Supreme Court, 1971)
Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. New Hampshire Aeronautics Commission
273 A.2d 676 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1971)
United States v. Department of Revenue of State of Ill.
191 F. Supp. 723 (N.D. Illinois, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 U.S. 218, 48 S. Ct. 451, 72 L. Ed. 857, 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,297, 1928 U.S. LEXIS 684, 56 A.L.R. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panhandle-oil-co-v-mississippi-ex-rel-knox-scotus-1928.